Sampson Onwuka.....
II
Any organizational structure that is using Austin as
primitive name or has reasons to work for Austin and compensated by
Austin is not a private property, won’t that religious persecutions are
serious allegations that should be taken on a face level. This high
exhibition (exhibitionism) of 'uncivil rites' its cult pornography and
initiation is completely banned in both US and in Mexico and by Austin
Statute and Texas Laws, all the parties involved may be feeling strong
about their abuse of process but not for long. Speaking of burning
American flags, it is Holmes, Oliver Wendell Holmes that you need to
resurrect since his position for and against first amendment rights and
extreme speech is item that covers the individual rights to personal
property, image, identity, flags, etc.
You have
to resurrect August Belmont of 5th Avenue New York that only lends away
from the rest of us the fact that burning effigies in any reasons are
material considerations for fires and intent as burning house as means
of inciting public hate or similar emotions or Arson as the incidents of
riots may suggest. To these groups you need to resurrect D.L Moody and
his church is their issues and protest against the ‘uncivil rites’. Do
not accept my words, perhaps some things need not be discussed but
District Attorneys and Police Detective – at least in Austin - are not
supposed to know everything, including Citizens, but 'Uncivil Rites' and
amelioration of a private's 'Image' 'Effigy' and Statutory, inversion
of his primacy and invasion of privacy are acts that are its
impermissible by law anywhere and cannot be that different from Austin.
Unless
the D.A’s and her assistance are telling us too much, that such actions
are permissible with referencing the laws, directly and derisively,
their silence its adequate and such act my continue but there is nothing
that paints a bad picture of human condition than a mother and child.
Some action however devious constitutes acute personal deformation even
with consent from both parties given the thresholds of exhibition, but
you are so smart that it was a child that is the cause of these
problems. Perhaps you can please everybody all you have to do is try
harder. Some of the initiative administered by the Health Sciences in
Austin is not blameless some of it are just downright illegal.
But
the forms of agreement between the City of Austin and the department
which administer health science involve the false and misleading use of
Neuro-apathy as a way to sensitize the intended object. But for the fact
that it is used for control reasons in certain privileged situation,
the total estimate and worth of such exercise is something that can be
investigated from the perspective of damages to a patient in Psychology.
That the issue of self-medication is really with meanings of definition
on the nature of self-help involving person to person therapy and the
early stages and not later of unemployment and not later. It does not
mean that the therapy for job hunting as getting over any job works for
everyone, or that it should be applied with all intent until the patient
is fractured. It seems that what UTA and the authors of some of the
guide for Health Science and mental health left out these lengthy
discourses on the abuse and criminal application of the process.
There
are no doubts that a panel of six judges passes an informed position on
anybody that such a person is mentally struggling and deficient, even
if such a person is the most astute and mentally healthy individual he
or she is automatically insane or bordering on such précis. Here’s the
picture, there is a saying that attributed to Einstein about doing the
same thing over and through and expecting a good result can be
considered madness or insanity. This saying has given additional impetus
on the people pushing the limits of the health department to a whole
different level and it is experienced by different people and for
different kinds of reasons.
A part of the human
brain essentially dies to sustain other parts of the brain, and like
the chances in the many parts of the world, we must great pleasures in
observing these. Sickness differs from disease since the first is the
product of conditions and may alleviate its suffering when circumstances
change, but a disease is more than any infirmity, it has a causing
agent – perhaps a germ or protozoa. This is no doubt similar to areas of
psychology that deals with aging process. For instance a man is sick
from old age does not mean he is diseased, but some conditions of the
body may no longer support itself and its system and it becomes
vulnerable to all forms of transitive situations.
A
woman may be considered sick for other reasons than disease causing
agent, for instance a degenerative condition of the heart or the brain
or forms of neurosis may permanently force this woman into actions that
are extremely dangerous to the conscience of the general society. Fact
is, the changes from aging is slow and therefore not visible, they
gradually accumulate and like incontinent conditions fecal edifice,
these patients do everywhere and it is perfectly normal – at least for
the most of it. We may not therefore pretend that some of the changes in
the life of anyone should be permitted to enter the life of others, to
the degree that such a person and their privileged positioned inspire
social sickness whose symptoms are neurosis and the outcomes depended on
actions or our failure to act in the any such circumstances.
We
may suggest that the saying that human beings return to a past as a way
to refresh their minds on the present conditions of happiness are
issues of neurosis, that some actions that impact these victims usually
transit between the brain and the motor neurons, and each information
system a question of the human synapses and memory which increases with
age and in age serve as nerve system with great experience and exposure
of what they call adaptation. Humans adapt to their environment because
of our body and in most cases because of the Chromosome 5, but if in
the course of one’s aging process with layers and layers of dead and
acquired information that some action and incident exceed what we are
used, this incident in whatever form they occur remain a very permanent
mark in the life of any victim.
Put in
differently, neurologically pathways are information reservoirs and
memory synapses that can be injured and therefore revert to pain and in
the failure of the victim to overcome it, it reverts to suffering. One
of the more enduring problems of human sex hormones is the ability of
the body to reproduce. It is not a mystery that we age in time and the
reasons are well known, however, we wonder at the reasons why release of
protein from the body through the reproductive systems, for instance
the male through the penis elixirs such joy in coming. You utterly
wasted after half an hour and need another half to recover and then a
wasting and circle is repeated. Perhaps the statement bring to mind some
ancient saying that sex was no less than what it is a process of
transduction, a process of nihilistic reduction that gives the
impression death, dying and perhaps a rejuvenation.
This type-cast is not new in psychology that reproduction was also a process of decay and death.
All
life is death - all nature decay – is perhaps within the meaning that
the release of any energy is commingled to some ultimate oblivion, but
we are aware of this transition since from our rejuvenation we notice a
difference. Eventually it comes to an end, but for trying, life
continues. What we are looking at is what happens to a body when it is
already in very bad state – at least approached puberty and then the
unstoppable and immortalization nerve pounding hormones to let go. Sex
at this statement may be enjoyable – even for another 60 years of its
career where people share stories of their past, and who shared with
whom, when, and how.
The issue is that the
brain is best able to release any hints of pleasure or so called
pleasure because it has matured and the release of energy for any number
of reason would be a new and released tendency which the nerves and the
body experiences and for the men, releasing the spermatozoa, was a form
of life from decay and that injures a part of the buried neurological
information which the brain in adaptive episodes of the environment is
forced to reverse triggering a release which the body experiences for a
moment as a kindly sensation. For a fact that experience this new decay
with its primary and put it differently, if we, for instance the men, as
perhaps the women, began like urethra to release this liquid and
protein from the body at a very early age, almost from childbirth, like
the urine and the effects whose pleasurable release still linger till
old age, sex and release of spermatozoa may or may be that desirable and
pleasurable.
It is true that the author has
made some careful ovation on the plurality of unemployment and human
habits and has written about unemployment process and the demands of
being a patient as equal and similar, but being a patient of habit does
not arise from unemployment but the brain like the human body can souse
its elder injuries and memories buried deep. The intellectual approach
for instance to the lasting issue of American urban life and perpetual
underclass – if any – is a surgical procedure into the past with no
intentions of removing the cancer with no means of advising new models
from old. In some sense, human habits begin with unusual experience and
ends differently.
In command of this basic
understanding on how for sexual experience for instance rape injures the
brain, we see from a matter better choice which can hold its ground to
the end and the serious problem of injuries to the body of the least
suspecting individual. The main fact is that rape as a war material does
not disfigure from humbling psychological processes especially when
past and forgotten experience is soused without notice. A harshly spoken
word to a life-long partner can conjure dislocating images from the
past, can injure and sometimes per-force behavioral aptitude no longer
at least with normal people whose behaviors are equally exaggerated. But
these individuals may choose to perhaps prolong their pain or
exaggerate the injury which others inflicted on them. But the
discomfiture do not deny the acceptance that some injuries are
necessary, but a riddle or perhaps a joke, bitter revelations and
perhaps truth can be handled differently and with wry and aplomb.
Altogether,
the leading psychological indexing and principle vicar reasons for
using a therapy is to expose the more hidden and more reserved bunion of
original intents and ugly past which determines an existence and in
various aspects suffers us from exercising psychological freedom. There
is an error among the eagles of human psychology that tends to
emphasize over-active psychology and loud display as a psychology
dimension worthy of some treatment, perhaps a form of embolism and anal
penetration and other forms of Freudian sexual therapy for hysteria
which does not meet the intent for such a therapy. For some reasons, the
past through which we see the future is psychological reversed, does
not mean that we see it the future from the past only upside down,
rather there is some experience about the past we see from a time light
no longer at ease. It is a classic case of sense defense and perhaps the
most idea behind the issues of self-preservation – argued by first
class psychologist such as Henry James as the one most enduring laws of
nature.
But the parallax error is mistaken as
obviate mathematical of logical proceeding, and we bargain that the
logical inertia which catapults an oneiric from a first speak of human
intuition and sensory experiences send us from the center of inner
gravity to a future that is not exactly possible without our presence.
For all intended purpose this experience and the reserve –psychology as
from Michael Fouquet (?) is sensation is one vitae, a vista that
excludes the irrelevant from the vastly unusual and allows the better
part of human nature or like Pinker’s ‘Better Angels’ meet us at center
of social discourse and in narrating human reaction to human situation,
we create a hero from the past. What is the struggle of understanding
human beings since the creation of the very divine logos – which George
Steiner once argued to have started perhaps in the Garden of Eden or
when Adam heard the first voice or perhaps as I argued that it was
buried in Adam’s response to the question.
In
all reality, we could bend backwards on the assumptions we are part of
an experience that higher but the experience in all probability is
either an injury to what we are used to or an exercise that has no
meeting point saving the purpose it serves. It imposes a reasonable
doubt scenario to a position taken by any group of experts on any
subject under the sky that the assumptions and final results are perhaps
the better judge of any recommendations- however primitive and however
bitter. For sure the few, who recover in Health Science industries from
even the least forms of relapsing, are not just grateful but are
sometimes with the assurance the least came with the most and sometime
unnecessary sacrifice. Be-deviled from a therapy which we all need, we
experience great difficulties in straying from a record and perhaps a
history and above all, we stray only slightly from hints of
contamination within the scope of decision making process.
Habits
are a conscious departure from routine is not routine as conscious
departure from process. It looks to suggest here that acquired human
behavior is usually susceptible is pruning the determinant fiber of once
psychology, the past, the infancy, the experiences of a tender age and
psycho-analysis of a gifted redoubtable serve a purpose in understanding
human experiences. But the inoculation which it prunes is not an
article of history or should be relegated to Psychology or forms the
basic oasis of human ineluctable. It seems to do at better ends of
experience, as part of recollection but tethers on some humbling
experiences – this humbling process is better placed from human
experience, and the patient struggles against time to let go but in the
end, experiences something varied but not the same in some far we can
argue against the very discipline of psychology.
We
bargain here that the total knowledge from the total academic
disciplines available to these humans who have struggled against one
obstacle from beginning of the brain development converge in two three
process, the beginning, the construct and the end. It is the I and thou
psychology of facing the very object in our immediate purview that
animates a sense of judging and accessing, that such and such persons of
interest is lacking in this and in that. This is not the best argument
on self-preservation or does flirt with conceptions of God or divinity
or does place second pole of understanding or revealing in the idea of
speech, response or self-defense which is the engine of the divine
logos.
Perhaps somewhere in the evolution of human psychology
as anthropologists argue we moved from seeing what in front of us or
binary exchange between us and the object of confusion to a different
part of human thing, one that identifies no just thou and I – best for
origins of covenant and survival trend or covenant as survival trend –
but to what lies behind us and our side. This aspect which forms the
bases on how we now generalize on others is a human construct cannot be
redeemed from one solution or buried under the asymptotic panoply that
one solution is for all.
All laws of abstraction
which the process of inquiry does not sponsor or defeat the limits
psychology is that inquiry which ends with the three mode of
investigation is an item which is found in the I and thou theorem, a
classic factor that requires some one and one meeting and the narrating
that attempts to expose the past and release the object from its
injuries. But if the only form of third angle understanding in human
thinking, perhaps a third polar tent in the intellectual diagram is
indeed an item of the third person which others, than abstraction cannot
exist without examples or without imitations of nature, it is therefore
an abstraction – the gut of Art and altogether artificial.
There
is therefore no beginning and no end in narrating certain ideological
influences, but for all intent of forcing some experience to perpetuate
an ideology, we may occasional souse other problems no longer an affair
in one’s life. This a lateral measure of human discipline and it buries
the better of human nature in the least possible format, that
abstraction in psychology without the matters of hysteria which are
temporary are questions one’s environment and exhibit of one’s authority
in any class of respect and privilege.
All privilege is equal to one ultimate ends, the advantage.
For
some treatment which need not specify the spectra of some experiences
with intent at directly or derisively reductionist, should not be held
any longer than necessary in the process of some delivery than for
instance War Veterans of most colors of the world experience different
things and for different reasons and are required to endure a counselor
in the Army or elsewhere do not always push the limits of their own
ability or do feel trapped by a past. We can argue that the experience
of some sort, of forcing obvious negative reaction from others are no
articles of psychology are in fact primitive human behavior and in the
end, it leads to several ends, one of it’s the destruction of intent or
temptation, or in different language lust, that the end result is a
streak for an end, how slowly is how well we understand primitive
psychology and nihilism, whereas Freud and Nietzsche measures the ending
as death in gradual escape.
We look from a second angle,
that all pains are one way or another degrees of experiences that
enables the logically assessment of human experience to harass the rate
of exposure and in the end, translate the exposure from one layer of
synaptic energy, muscles and memory to another, where is injuries which
are similar tend to fracture the body involuntary ability and may not
create as much pain as some pain but due to the relationship between
speech and logic and logic to the brain’s ability to arrange and access
an exposure, may lead us into action and reactions that arise from the
failure to justify some action.
In the fifties
it was thought that the brain has several parts that act as a buffer for
several activities, but as time proceeded, it gradually became clear
that the brain is a series of interconnected systems sending, receiving
and analyzing information. If we suggest that a certain biologist Walter
Rudolf Hess was the architect of this new ideology, it may miss the
point about the person and persons who made the general argument about
the brain are part of his general dogma. How can this be? The study of
the human brain has occupied our anxiety and curiosity from day one.
Human brain function even from early stages or embryonic stages is based
on certain series of receptacles, especially 26th week during which the
residues from the developing embryo settles at the primitive streak
coalescing into what is called the Spine which attaches new nerve system
from the spine to the fallopian tubes.
It
exposes the hair duct and we experience sensory messages from the end of
the residue to the ends of function of human gene and protein
expressing the legs and the hands. But the bones are the earliest
calcite from the body too junior to release from the blood and body and
other bi-product which the baby also needs, and then the nerve evolve
attached to the brain and with exposure and experience, we also begin to
reaction from the brain after the past 11 through 26 weeks, and from
this period, much of the actions that body takes, especially in nerve
ending and suicide missions of the cells and protein which must die and
part ways to allow the fingers and the toes to form separately is
controlled by the reverse reaction from the end of nerve system
barricade against the mother in position at embryo through the residual
olfactory of human west and calcium which insulate against
over-production or rapid and unchecked profligate division of the cells.
Long story long, the body assumes the shape at the embryo and forbids
injuries during pregnancy and after, and the brain serves as the
director as both the insulations and for information processing.
The
activity of the motor neurons which take over the body and the
intermediate psychology of human beings from this period, returns to
this formative structure and through the use of the noise which these
nerve generate the sensitive nature of human experience from birth and
environment is gifted new meaning and new significance, but the body
does not sway from this course in all its developmental levels. One of
the left over characteristics of not only early development of the brain
and human body is what happens during specific eponym of child
development. We are no strangers to a child development up to the age of
12, - probably the best years of any human which differs from other
animals, indicating that a child is owned for life if damages are done
to his to her brain at this period. One of such instance is the current
President of United States – Barrack Obama – raised in both United
States and Asia, has not since his 11th and 12th year departed from his
experiences which is no different from the embryonic experiences and the
death of a process for instance the birth.
The
tendency of all human beings to per-force a perpetual class is within
the injuries and information exposed to at this period particularly the
environment, the community and the public media houses, an item well
known by all and asunder but here with more meaning, we place these
strange origins on human existence and intellectual development as a
period that is slightly devoid of nature, devoid of the biological
development saving for one thing, that body assumes its mode at this
period and merely duplicate as the days pass. Of course character by
virtue of all assessment, Piaget to mention, encourage better behavioral
exposures between ages 12 and 18 when most characters are formed. These
are no items that dissimilar from the formalities of brain functions,
but attitudes to even sex and sexuality is given several definition and
ammunition, ending differently or variously as the alter of social
motivations. ….
One point must be taken into
account about this multi-functional nature of the brain systems and that
has to embryonic stages of the brain. In some sense the organizer
principle of the Hans Spemann seem relatively through that despite the
view that the brain act for several reactions and for prolonged period
of time, it the gradual evolution of the brain that is actually
important. But in response to speech and patterns of speech, the work of
Walter Hess, former professor Emeritus after ‘34 years of research and
teaching at the University of Zurich’ that enough separation of the
action potential of the cerebrum in relation to expression seem entirely
demonstrated from the standpoint of biological arrangement of human
brain and the mind which is a recollection or better exercise of all
information processed in reverse like the eyes and the what it captures;
it captures in reverse – upside down. This part of nature that need be
unduly damaged to expose to extreme experiences of all types and all
classes that is quite second to our nature or what makes human, that an
injury is relative and what is relative is not an inquiry, beyond the I
and thou theorem, that it meets us separately that human nature is an
abstraction.
Human nature is governed by many
things which is nearly all of it is experience and these experiences are
relative. But the length and depth of any experience does not with
exposure and what the body is used to, it is how the body is introduced
to some experience if any that determines its verity, its outcome and
its results. If the rehearse backwards, a forced reaction or expensive
coaxing leads from something that it has a way of justifying its effect
and this effect need to be looked into especially the psychological
level of the individual or the patient. I take a case of Sexual activity
and innuendo as
